| Organization/PurposeHow well the narrative, real or imagined, holds together: a clear focus, a plot, an established setting and characters, a logical sequence, an opening and an ending.1–4 points | The organization of the narrative is fully sustained, and the focus is clear and kept throughout. - An effective plot gives the story a sense of unity and completeness.
- The setting, narrator and/or characters, and point of view (from grade 7), are effectively established.
- A variety of transitions is used consistently to clarify how ideas and events relate, with strong connections between them.
- Events follow a natural, logical sequence from beginning to end.
- The opening and closure are effective for the audience and purpose.
| The organization of the narrative is adequately sustained, and the focus is adequate and generally kept. - An evident plot gives a sense of unity and completeness, though there may be minor flaws and some loosely connected ideas.
- The setting, narrator and/or characters, and point of view (from grade 7), are adequately established.
- A variety of transitions is used adequately.
- The sequence of events is adequate from beginning to end.
- The opening and closure are adequate for the audience and purpose.
| The organization of the narrative is somewhat sustained and the focus may be uneven. - The plot may be inconsistent, with evident flaws.
- The setting, narrator and/or characters, and point of view (from grade 7), are established unevenly or only minimally.
- Transitions are used unevenly and/or with little variety.
- The sequence of events is weak or uneven.
- The opening and closure, if present, are weak.
| The organization of the narrative may be maintained, but it has little or no focus. - There is little or no discernible plot, or the story is only a series of events.
- The piece may be brief, with little or no attempt to establish a setting, narrator and/or characters, or point of view (from grade 7).
- There are few or no appropriate transitions, which may leave the reader confused.
- There is little or no organized sequence of events; unrelated ideas show up often and/or the story drifts badly.
- The opening and/or closure may be missing or unsatisfying.
| —Not used for this criterion | |
|---|
| Development/ElaborationHow well the narrative is developed through details, dialogue, description, narrative techniques and language, including any connections to the task's sources.1–4 points | Thorough, effective elaboration through relevant details, dialogue and/or description. - Experiences, characters, setting and/or events are clearly developed.
- Connections to the source materials may make the narrative stronger.
- A variety of narrative techniques is used effectively to move the story forward or show the experience.
- Sensory, concrete and figurative language is used effectively and clearly serves the purpose.
- An effective, appropriate style strengthens the storytelling.
| Adequate elaboration through details, dialogue and/or description. - Experiences, characters, setting and/or events are adequately developed.
- Connections to the source materials may add to the narrative.
- A variety of narrative techniques is used adequately and generally moves the story forward or shows the experience.
- Sensory, concrete and figurative language is used adequately and generally serves the purpose.
- The style is generally appropriate.
| Uneven, cursory elaboration, with partial or uneven use of details, dialogue and/or description. - Experiences, characters, setting and/or events are developed unevenly.
- Connections to the source materials may be ineffective, awkward or vague, but they do not get in the way of the narrative.
- Narrative techniques are used unevenly and inconsistently.
- Sensory, concrete and figurative language is partial or weak and may not serve the purpose.
- The attempt at an appropriate style is inconsistent or weak.
| Minimal elaboration, with few or no details, dialogue and/or description. - Experiences, characters, setting and/or events may be vague, unclear or confusing.
- Connections to the source materials, if any, may take away from the narrative.
- Narrative techniques are minimal, missing, used incorrectly or irrelevant.
- There is little or no sensory, concrete or figurative language, which may get in the way of the purpose.
- There is little or no sign of an appropriate style.
| —Not used for this criterion | |
|---|
| ConventionsCommand of sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar usage and spelling, scored as one holistic judgment.0–2 points | —Not used for this criterion | —Not used for this criterion | Adequate command of conventions. - Sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar usage and spelling are adequately correct for the length of the response.
| Partial command of conventions. - Correct use of sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar usage and spelling is limited.
| Little or no command of conventions. - Correct use of sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar usage and spelling is infrequent.
| |
|---|