AP English Argument Essay

Responds to the prompt rather than restate or rephrase the prompt, and the thesis clearly takes a position rather than just stating that there are pros/cons.

Does not meet criteria for one point. Responses that do not earn this point: * There is no defensible thesis. * The intended thesis only restates the prompt. * The intended thesis provides a summary of the issue with no apparent or coherent claim. * There is a thesis, but it does not respond to the prompt. * Only restate the prompt. * Do not take a position or the position is vague or must be inferred. * State an obvious fact rather than making a claim that requires a defense.

Uniformly offer evidence to support claims. Focus on the importance of specific details to build an argument. Organize and support an argument as a line of reasoning composed of multiple supporting claims, each with adequate evidence that is clearly explained.

Uniformly offer evidence to support claims. Focus on the importance of specific details to build an argument. Organize an argument as a line of reasoning composed of multiple supporting claims. Commentary may fail to integrate some evidence or fail to support a key claim.

Provides some specific, relevant evidence. Explains how some of the evidence relates to the student’s argument, but no line of reasoning is established, or the line of reasoning is faulty. Consist of a mix of specific evidence and broad generalities. May contain some simplistic, inaccurate, or repetitive explanations that don’t strengthen the argument.

Provides evidence that is mostly general. Summarizes the evidence but does not explain how the evidence supports the argument. Tend to focus on summary of evidence rather than specific details.

Does not meet the criteria for 1 point. Responses that do not earn this point: * Attempt to contextualize their argument, but such attempts consist of predominantly of sweeping generalizations. * Only hint or suggest other arguments. Use complicated or complex sentences or language that is ineffective because it does not enhance the student's argument.

Demonstrates sophistication of thought and/or a complex understanding of the rhetorical situation by doing any of the following: 1. Crafting a nuanced argument by consistently identifying and exploring complexities or tensions. 2. Articulating the implications or limitations of an argument (either the student’s argument or an argument related to the prompt) by situating it within a broader context. 3. Making effective rhetorical choices that consistently strengthen the force and impact of the student’s argument. 4. Employing a style that is consistently vivid and persuasive.

Does not meet the criteria for 1 point. Responses that do not earn this point: * Attempt to contextualize their argument, but such attempts consist predominantly of sweeping generalizations. * Only hint or suggest other arguments. * Use complicated or complex sentences or language that is ineffective because it does not enhance the student's argument.