Idea Development, Organization, and Coherence Evaluates the development of ideas, organization, and coherence in the argument. | 4 pts | 3 pts | 2 pts | 1 pt | 0 pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description | The student's response is a well-developed argument that effectively relates and supports claims with clear reasons and relevant text-based evidence. - Effectively introduces claim(s) - Uses an organizational strategy to present reasons and relevant evidence logically - Supports claim(s) with clear reasons and relevant evidence using specific, well-chosen facts, details, or other information from credible sources and demonstrates a good understanding of the topic or texts - Acknowledges and counters opposing claim(s), as appropriate - Uses words, phrases, and/or clauses that effectively connect and show clear, strong relationships among claim(s), reasons, and evidence - Establishes and maintains a formal style that is appropriate for the task, purpose, and audience - Provides a strong concluding statement or section that logically follows from the argument presented. | The student's response is a complete argument that relates and supports claims with some text-based evidence. - Clearly introduces claim(s) - Uses an organizational strategy to present some reasons and evidence (uses specific facts, details, definitions, examples, and/or other information from sources to develop claim(s)) - Attempts to acknowledge and/or counter opposing claim(s), as appropriate - Links reasons and/or pieces of evidence and ideas to show relationships among claim(s), reasons, and evidence - Uses words and phrases consistently for task, purpose, and audience - Establishes and maintains a mostly formal style for the task, purpose, and audience - Provides a concluding statement or section related to the argument presented. | The student's response is an incomplete or weak attempt to write an argument that sometimes relates and/or supports claims with little text-based evidence. - May not introduce claim(s) - Develops, sometimes unevenly, reasons and/or evidence to support claim(s) - Makes little, if any, attempt to acknowledge or counter opposing claim(s) - Attempts to support claim(s) with facts, reasons, and other evidence sometimes, but logic and relevance are often unclear - Uses few words or phrases to connect ideas; connections are not always clear - Uses a formal style inconsistently or an informal style that does not fit task, purpose, or audience - Provides a weak concluding statement or section that may not follow the argument presented. | The student's response is a weak attempt to write an argument and does not support claims with adequate text-based evidence. - May not introduce claim(s); claim(s) must be inferred - May be too brief to demonstrate an organizational structure, or no structure is evident - Has minimal support for claim(s) - Makes no attempt to acknowledge or counter opposing claim(s) - Uses minimal or no words or phrases to connect ideas - Uses a very informal style that is not appropriate for task, purpose, or audience - Provides a minimal or no concluding statement or section. | The student will receive a condition code for various reasons: Blank / Copied / Too Limited to Score/Illegible/Incomprehensible / Non-English/Foreign Language / Off Topic/Off Task/Offensive. |
Language Usage and Conventions Evaluates the command of language usage and conventions. | 3 pts | 2 pts | 1 pt | 0 pts |
---|---|---|---|---|
Description | The student's response demonstrates full command of language usage and conventions. - Effectively varies sentence patterns for meaning, reader/listener interest, and style - Shows command of language and conventions - Any errors in usage and conventions do not interfere with meaning. | The student's response demonstrates partial command of language usage and conventions. - Varies some sentence patterns for meaning, reader/listener interest, and style - Shows some knowledge of language and conventions when writing - Has minor errors in usage and conventions with no significant effect on meaning. | The student's response demonstrates weak command of language usage and conventions. - Has fragments, run-ons, and/or other sentence structure errors - Shows little knowledge of language and conventions when writing - Has frequent errors in usage and conventions that interfere with meaning. | The student will receive a condition code for various reasons: Blank / Copied / Too Limited to Score/Illegible/Incomprehensible / Non-English/Foreign Language / Off Topic/Off Task/Offensive. |
Create your free EasyClass AI account in seconds. No credit card required.
Upload student work as PDFs, images, or paste text directly. Batch upload supported.
AI grades using this exact rubric with detailed feedback in seconds, not hours.